I’ve just finished my chapter for the book of the Reading Between The Lines conference. My chapter included a critique of Gadamer’s account of science, in his book Truth and Method and elsewhere.
I argue that Gadamer makes deeply misleading claims about what science involves, and does not reference any practising natural or social scientist; as far as I can tell, Gadamer’s most recent reference to an actual scientist was from someone writing 98 years before the publication of Truth and Method. Oh, and Gadamer misquotes this scientist and treats him as far more naive than he was.
But many commentators simply repeat Gadamer’s caricatures or pass over them in silence. This might actually be more troubling than Gadamer’s naughty scholarship.
My question is: can anyone point me to a good critique of Gadamer’s account of science? So far, I’ve only found five people who criticise any aspect of his account of science:
- pp. 226 and 236 of Dieter Misgeld’s article in the journal Philosophy of Social Science, from 1979;
- pp. 168-9 of Richard Bernstein’s Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (1983);
- the opening chapter of Joel Weinsheimer’s Gadamer’s Hermeneutics (1985) – this is the most powerful critique but still leaves Gadamer largely unscathed;
- p. 4 of Georgia Warnke’s Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (1987); and
- p. 158 of Robert D’Amico’s book Contemporary Continental Philosophy (1999).
If you can point me to any other references – preferably in English! – I’d be most grateful. Thanks!